momor.ai
Open Search

Solutions · Procurement

Evaluations that are consistent, fair and explainable.

Every bid scored against the published criteria, every change applied to every bidder.

Talk to usSee how we deliver it

The work

Bid evaluations are slow and inconsistent.

Bid evaluations are slow and inconsistent; when a requirement changes mid-tender, it is hard to show every bidder was treated the same way.

Three bids, one method

Two independent scorers read every bid.

Different models, chosen through Gateway, score each bid against the criteria and cite the page for each score.

Step 1 of 4
Bids3
Scorers2

Where they disagree, the panel decides.

Agreements stand as proposals. Two scores differ by more than a point and go to the panel.

Step 2 of 4
AgreedMost cells
Disputed2 cells

A requirement changes mid-tender.

An addendum changes delivery. Every bid’s delivery score is redone, not just the one that prompted it, with old and new scores shown.

Step 3 of 4
Delivery scoresRedone for all

The panel approves the scores.

The record shows criteria, evidence and who decided each disputed score.

Step 4 of 4
RecordComplete
The question, as the person sees itApprove the scores for tender T-12?

Illustrative.

Step 1 of 4
Bids3
Scorers2
Step 2 of 4
AgreedMost cells
Disputed2 cells
Step 3 of 4
Delivery scoresRedone for all
Step 4 of 4
RecordComplete
The question, as the person sees itApprove the scores for tender T-12?

Who does what

Rules, AI and people, each in their place.

  • RulesThe published evaluation method and weights.
  • AIFirst-pass reading and scoring with citations.
  • PeopleThe evaluation panel decides all scores and the award.

What stays

A record you can follow.

The full evaluation record for audit and debriefs.

How the knowledge graph works →

First deployment

First-pass evaluation for one tender category.

Start with one process.

Talk to usSee how we deliver itBuild it yourself