A finding under challenge
A finding stands on two sources.
A witness statement and a camera timestamp, independent of each other.
A news article repeats the witness.
It is linked to the witness statement, not counted as new support.
New evidence contradicts the finding.
Phone records place the owner 12 km away at 21:35. Both are shown side by side; neither is deleted.
Two models argue the point.
On different providers, they debate whether the camera clock could be off, and write down what is and isn’t established. It is labelled as analysis, not a finding.
The investigator decides the next step.
Request the camera’s calibration and re-interview the witness.
Illustrative.