Same claim, same decision
Two similar water-damage claims arrive.
C-4410 and C-4417: a burst pipe, photos and a plumber’s invoice in each.
Both go through the same steps.
Coverage is checked, the AI reads the photos and invoice, and a model suited to the task scores severity inside the guideline.
Each decision shows its reasons.
The rule, the evidence and who decided. C-4417 goes straight through because it is below the handler-review amount.
A third claim doesn’t add up.
C-4423’s invoice doesn’t match its photos. Momor doesn’t decide: it asks a senior handler, with both pieces side by side.
Months later, any decision can be explained.
Which rule applied, what evidence it stood on, and who decided.
Illustrative.